home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: firefly.prairienet.org!claevius
- From: claevius@firefly.prairienet.org (Brent Busby)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.emulations
- Subject: Re: Pentium Bridgeboard.....Would you buy one?
- Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.emulations
- Date: 16 Mar 1996 09:29:47 GMT
- Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <4ie1mb$gia@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>
- References: <4hoer5$de1@earth.superlink.net> <4i93i1$gb1@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4idfhk$44a@earth.superlink.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: firefly.prairienet.org
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Dave Cinege (dcinege@superlink.net) wrote:
-
- : You have brought up a good point here. I can't promise it will
- : run on Linux. It is very rare to find chipset manufactures that make drivers
- : for it. This seems strange to me, because it seems there are more people
- : running Linux/XFree86 then SCO Unix/XWindows. To squeeze the video on there
- : I'm afraid the more common chipsets would take up to much room.
-
- : At the very least it would support Win 3.1/95/NT OS/2.
- : But since we would be limited in our choice for a chipset, I think XFree86
- : is out unless the manufature makes it, or someone developed it on their own.
-
- There are a lot of chipsets supported now for it, though. When XFree86
- first came out, there was a list of somewhere on the order of only six
- common SVGA chipsets that were supported, and if you didn't have one of
- those, you were stuck with monochrome generic VGA, if anything at all.
- Now, almost all video cards can hope to have some kind of color usability
- with existing XFree86 drivers, some cards' chipsets being supported better
- than others. Really, if you used almost any of the common chipsets that
- are in use on video cards today, you'd stand a good chance of being able
- to pull off XFree86 on the proposed bridgeboard. The only thing I was
- worried about was that the UVGA chip that got used might end up being so
- exotic, like old Packard Bell's hardware was, that no existing driver
- could match it. If you can get *any* of the existing chipsets to fit on
- the board, it will work. The XFree86 people run a web page where they
- describe their chipset support; this is where I found out about it. I
- wish I remembered what the URL was. (Maybe someone out there who knows
- can post it...?) I located it with the Lycos WWW search engine, which
- indexes over ninety percent of the web sites on the Net, so you could
- probably just find it by www'ing "http://www.lycos.com/" and doing a
- search for "XFree86", if you're interested in seeing which chipsets work.
- (And if you can't get an XFree86 compatible chipset on the board,
- could you at least make it possible to completely supercede the on-board
- hardware with an ISA video card of the user's choice?)
-
-
- : >Fantastic! I prefer SCSI, but if you're going to provide it on the
- : >bridgeboard itself, hey, I'm not *that* picky..
-
- : The problem with putting a PC SCSI card right now the board is the lack of
- : standards for SCSI in the PC realm. Unlike the Amiga it is not uncommon to
- : have to change controllers because it won't work with a device, or recognize
- : a format. I've had to do it several times.
-
- Hey, like I said, if you're putting it on the board, I'd almost not care if
- it were RLL... (Okay, maybe I'd care a *little* bit...) :-) But again, if
- it will allow the user to disable it, either with a software toggle, or with
- a hardware jumper or DIP switch on the board, then the user could go ahead
- and use an Adaptec SCSI card or whatever kind of host adaptor they could get
- it to work with. (I'm successfully using an Adaptec AHA1542CF SCSI-II board
- with my A2386SX, and it's running a 2 Gig Seagate Barracuda....)
-
-
- : >Just as the PCPrefs program included with the Janus software has an option
- : >to "Don't Load" the Janus-Handler segment, whatever cross-communication
- : >software this board ends up using should also ideally have a disable option.
- : >Without this, running alternative operating systems like OS/2 and Linux will
- : >be difficult or impossible, and a lot of us find that very important. Janus
- : >was really only designed for compatibility with MS-DOS and Windows.
-
- : Amouse was a bad idea on crack. This would be done properly so there would
- : be no lose of speed and would work with any OS that supports a MS mouse on
- : com 1. And it also be disabled.
-
- Cool. :-)
-
-
- --
- Amiga /// | | "They had a glow-in-the-dark
- 040 /// | Brent Busby ("Sequencer") | Santa in their yard. Santa
- \\\/// | claevius@prairienet.org | isn't radioactive, is he?
- \XX/ | | Cool beans. Nuclear Santa."
-